fix(data): une saisie d heure refusee n efface plus la disponibilite

MNT-12. Le meme bloc de parsing date/heure vivait dans quatre modules avec
trois reponses differentes a la meme saisie invalide : signaler et rediriger,
mettre la valeur a None et annoncer la reussite, ou passer au suivant en
silence. Les vagues E et G ont ferme le cote matchs avec des schemas ; il
restait la disponibilite, les creneaux de coach et les demandes individuelles.

Deux choses trouvees en appliquant, aucune dans le constat.

OneOnOneRequestSchema et DisponibilityAddSchema etaient definis dans
validators.py et appeles NULLE PART : aucun import, aucun test. C'est le
motif SEC-AUTHZ-001 -- une politique de validation ecrite et non appliquee --
qui survivait dans un coin que personne n'avait rouvert. Les deux passaient
d'ailleurs par des fields.String + Regexp, qui verifient la forme et laissent
l'appelant convertir ; fields.Date et fields.Time font les deux.

Et manage_coach_availability supprimait tous les creneaux existants avant de
reajouter ceux qu'il savait lire, ignorant les autres en silence et repondant
{'success': true}. Un envoi malforme effacait donc les heures reservables
d'un coach en annoncant la reussite -- et les demandes individuelles sont
refusees contre exactement cette table, donc le coach devenait injoignable
sans que rien ne le dise. Une operation de remplacement doit tout valider
avant de rien supprimer : le lot est refuse en entier.

Trouve aussi : le controle de disponibilite comparait les chaines du
formulaire aux chaines serialisees, ce qui ne marchait que parce que les deux
cotes etaient en HH:MM a zero non significatif. La comparaison porte
desormais sur des objets time.

Et le lint a rattrape une regression que la relecture avait manquee --
sixieme fois : datetime retire de one_on_one.py alors que deux fonctions non
touchees l'utilisaient encore.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
GGThed
2026-08-11 20:20:25 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 9cedf4a038
commit 9166d8abeb
5 changed files with 539 additions and 111 deletions
+87 -58
View File
@@ -5,22 +5,52 @@ weekly availability blocks, and a coach's bookable slots for one-on-one
sessions.
"""
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from flask import flash, jsonify, redirect, render_template, request, url_for
from flask_babel import gettext as _
from flask_login import current_user, login_required
from marshmallow import ValidationError
from app.api import json_endpoint
from app.extensions import db
from app.forms import form_payload
from app.models import Coach, CoachAvailability, PlayerDisponibility, User
from app.routes.users.blueprint import users_bp
DAY_NAMES = ['Monday', 'Tuesday', 'Wednesday', 'Thursday', 'Friday', 'Saturday', 'Sunday']
from app.timeslots import day_name, slot_end
from app.validators import TimeSlotSchema
def add_30_minutes(t):
return (datetime.combine(datetime.today(), t) + timedelta(minutes=30)).time()
def _load_slots(payload_slots):
"""Validate a batch of posted slots, keeping the rejects.
Both bulk endpoints used to `continue` past anything malformed and then
answer `{'success': True}`. The client had no way to learn that a slot
had been dropped — and for coach availability that is destructive, since
the route deletes every existing slot before re-adding the ones it
accepted. A payload the browser mangled could therefore wipe a coach's
bookable hours and report success (MNT-12).
Args:
payload_slots: Whatever arrived under the `slots` key.
Returns:
tuple[list[dict], list[str]]: Accepted slots, and one message per
rejected one.
"""
schema = TimeSlotSchema()
accepted, rejected = [], []
for index, raw in enumerate(payload_slots or []):
if not isinstance(raw, dict):
rejected.append(f'slot {index}: expected an object')
continue
try:
accepted.append(schema.load(raw))
except ValidationError as err:
details = '; '.join(
f'{field}: {" ".join(str(m) for m in messages)}'
for field, messages in err.messages.items()
)
rejected.append(f'slot {index}: {details}')
return accepted, rejected
@users_bp.route('/disponibilities')
@@ -43,7 +73,7 @@ def get_disponibilities():
{
'id': d.id,
'day_of_week': d.day_of_week,
'day_name': DAY_NAMES[d.day_of_week],
'day_name': day_name(d.day_of_week),
'start_time': d.start_time.strftime('%H:%M'),
'end_time': d.end_time.strftime('%H:%M'),
}
@@ -68,7 +98,7 @@ def get_my_disponibilities():
{
'id': d.id,
'day_of_week': d.day_of_week,
'day_name': DAY_NAMES[d.day_of_week],
'day_name': day_name(d.day_of_week),
'start_time': d.start_time.strftime('%H:%M'),
'end_time': d.end_time.strftime('%H:%M'),
}
@@ -81,21 +111,18 @@ def get_my_disponibilities():
@login_required
def add_disponibility():
"""Add a disponibility block for the current player."""
day_of_week = request.form.get('day_of_week', type=int)
start_time_str = request.form.get('start_time')
if day_of_week is None or day_of_week < 0 or day_of_week > 6:
return jsonify({'error': 'Invalid day of week'}), 400
try:
start_time = datetime.strptime(start_time_str, '%H:%M').time()
except (ValueError, TypeError):
return jsonify({'error': 'Invalid time format'}), 400
slot = TimeSlotSchema().load(form_payload())
except ValidationError as err:
return jsonify({'error': 'Invalid slot', 'details': err.messages}), 400
end_time = add_30_minutes(start_time)
day_of_week = slot['day_of_week']
start_time = slot['start_time']
disponibility = PlayerDisponibility(
player_id=current_user.id,
day_of_week=day_of_week,
start_time=start_time,
end_time=end_time,
end_time=slot_end(start_time),
)
db.session.add(disponibility)
db.session.commit()
@@ -103,7 +130,7 @@ def add_disponibility():
{
'id': disponibility.id,
'day_of_week': disponibility.day_of_week,
'day_name': DAY_NAMES[disponibility.day_of_week],
'day_name': day_name(disponibility.day_of_week),
'start_time': disponibility.start_time.strftime('%H:%M'),
'end_time': disponibility.end_time.strftime('%H:%M'),
}
@@ -115,31 +142,23 @@ def add_disponibility():
@login_required
def add_disponibilities_bulk():
"""Add multiple disponibility blocks at once."""
data = request.get_json()
slots = data.get('slots', [])
created = []
for slot in slots:
day_of_week = slot.get('day_of_week')
start_time_str = slot.get('start_time')
if day_of_week is None or day_of_week < 0 or day_of_week > 6:
continue
try:
start_time = datetime.strptime(start_time_str, '%H:%M').time()
except (ValueError, TypeError):
continue
data = request.get_json(silent=True) or {}
accepted, rejected = _load_slots(data.get('slots'))
end_time = add_30_minutes(start_time)
created = []
for slot in accepted:
start_time = slot['start_time']
existing = PlayerDisponibility.query.filter_by(
player_id=current_user.id,
day_of_week=day_of_week,
day_of_week=slot['day_of_week'],
start_time=start_time,
).first()
if not existing:
disponibility = PlayerDisponibility(
player_id=current_user.id,
day_of_week=day_of_week,
day_of_week=slot['day_of_week'],
start_time=start_time,
end_time=end_time,
end_time=slot_end(start_time),
)
db.session.add(disponibility)
db.session.flush()
@@ -147,12 +166,16 @@ def add_disponibilities_bulk():
{
'id': disponibility.id,
'day_of_week': disponibility.day_of_week,
'day_name': DAY_NAMES[disponibility.day_of_week],
'day_name': day_name(disponibility.day_of_week),
'start_time': disponibility.start_time.strftime('%H:%M'),
}
)
db.session.commit()
return jsonify({'success': True, 'created': created})
# `rejected` is reported rather than swallowed. What was accepted is
# still saved — dropping a whole batch because one cell was malformed
# would be its own kind of surprise — but the client can now tell the
# difference between "nine slots saved" and "ten sent, nine saved".
return jsonify({'success': True, 'created': created, 'rejected': rejected})
@users_bp.route('/disponibilities/clear', methods=['POST'])
@@ -188,36 +211,42 @@ def manage_coach_availability():
return redirect(url_for('main.dashboard'))
if request.method == 'POST':
data = request.get_json()
slots = data.get('slots', []) if data else []
data = request.get_json(silent=True) or {}
accepted, rejected = _load_slots(data.get('slots'))
# Validate everything before deleting anything.
#
# This route replaces the coach's availability: it deleted every
# existing slot and then re-added the ones it could parse, skipping
# the rest in silence and answering `{'success': true}`. A payload
# the browser mangled therefore wiped a coach's bookable hours and
# reported success — and one-on-one requests are refused against
# exactly this table, so the coach became unbookable with nothing to
# show for it. Refusing the whole batch is the only safe answer when
# the operation is a replacement (MNT-12).
if rejected:
return jsonify(
{
'error': 'Invalid slots; nothing was changed.',
'rejected': rejected,
}
), 400
# Clear existing availability
CoachAvailability.query.filter_by(coach_id=current_user.id).delete()
# Add new slots
for slot in slots:
day_of_week = slot.get('day_of_week')
start_time_str = slot.get('start_time')
if day_of_week is None or day_of_week < 0 or day_of_week > 6:
continue
try:
start_time = datetime.strptime(start_time_str, '%H:%M').time()
end_time = (
datetime.combine(datetime.today(), start_time) + timedelta(minutes=30)
).time()
except (ValueError, TypeError):
continue
availability = CoachAvailability(
for slot in accepted:
start_time = slot['start_time']
db.session.add(
CoachAvailability(
coach_id=current_user.id,
day_of_week=day_of_week,
day_of_week=slot['day_of_week'],
start_time=start_time,
end_time=end_time,
end_time=slot_end(start_time),
)
)
db.session.add(availability)
db.session.commit()
return jsonify({'success': True})
return jsonify({'success': True, 'saved': len(accepted)})
existing_availability = CoachAvailability.query.filter_by(
coach_id=current_user.id,
+25 -22
View File
@@ -5,11 +5,14 @@ from datetime import datetime
from flask import flash, redirect, render_template, request, url_for
from flask_babel import gettext as _
from flask_login import current_user, login_required
from marshmallow import ValidationError
from app.extensions import db
from app.forms import flash_validation_errors, form_payload
from app.models import Coach, CoachAvailability, OneOnOneRequest, PersonalNote, Player, TeamNote
from app.routes.users.blueprint import users_bp
from app.services.notifications import send_discord_notification
from app.validators import OneOnOneRequestSchema
@users_bp.route('/one-on-one', methods=['GET', 'POST'])
@@ -46,9 +49,10 @@ def one_on_one():
.all()
)
coach_availability = []
if coach:
availabilities = CoachAvailability.query.filter_by(coach_id=coach.id).all()
# Kept as model objects for the availability check below, and serialised
# separately for the page. They used to be the same list of strings,
# which is what made the check compare '9:00' with '10:00' as text.
availabilities = CoachAvailability.query.filter_by(coach_id=coach.id).all() if coach else []
coach_availability = [
{
'day_of_week': av.day_of_week,
@@ -59,31 +63,30 @@ def one_on_one():
]
if request.method == 'POST':
date_str = request.form.get('date')
start_time_str = request.form.get('start_time')
end_time_str = request.form.get('end_time')
points = request.form.get('points', '').strip()
if not coach:
flash(_('Cannot request One on One - no coach assigned.'), 'danger')
return redirect(url_for('users.one_on_one'))
try:
date_obj = datetime.strptime(date_str, '%Y-%m-%d').date()
start_time = datetime.strptime(start_time_str, '%H:%M').time()
end_time = datetime.strptime(end_time_str, '%H:%M').time()
except (ValueError, TypeError):
flash(_('Invalid date or time format.'), 'danger')
data = OneOnOneRequestSchema().load(form_payload())
except ValidationError as err:
flash_validation_errors(err)
return redirect(url_for('users.one_on_one'))
check_date = datetime.strptime(date_str, '%Y-%m-%d')
day_of_week = check_date.weekday()
date_obj = data['date']
start_time = data['start_time']
end_time = data['end_time']
points = data['points'] or ''
# Compared as times, not as strings. The old code parsed the three
# form fields into objects and then compared the *original strings*
# against the serialised availability — which worked only because
# both sides happened to be zero-padded HH:MM.
is_available = any(
av['day_of_week'] == day_of_week
and av['start_time'] <= start_time_str
and av['end_time'] >= end_time_str
for av in coach_availability
av.day_of_week == date_obj.weekday()
and av.start_time <= start_time
and av.end_time >= end_time
for av in availabilities
)
if not is_available:
@@ -105,9 +108,9 @@ def one_on_one():
send_discord_notification(
player_name=current_user.full_name,
points=points,
date_str=date_str,
start_time_str=start_time_str,
end_time_str=end_time_str,
date_str=date_obj.strftime('%Y-%m-%d'),
start_time_str=start_time.strftime('%H:%M'),
end_time_str=end_time.strftime('%H:%M'),
team_name=org_team.name if org_team else 'Unknown Team',
coach_name=coach.full_name,
coach_discord=coach.discord_username or '',
+60
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
"""The half-hour slot, in one place (MNT-12).
Availability, coach bookings and matches are all built from the same rule:
*a slot given a start and no end lasts thirty minutes*. It was written five
times, in four modules, and the copies had drifted in the way that matters —
not in the arithmetic, but in what each did when the input was wrong:
matches.py flashed an error and redirected
matches.py, later set start_time to None and reported success
team_matches.py `except ValueError: pass`, silently
availability.py `continue`, dropping the slot without a word
Waves E and G closed the match side by putting a marshmallow schema at the
form boundary. This module is the other half: the constant and the two
functions the remaining callers need, so that the availability routes can
use the same schema treatment without each one re-deciding what a slot is.
`DEFAULT_SLOT_MINUTES` is deliberately not configurable. It is a product
decision written into the UI — the availability grid draws half-hour cells —
and a setting would let the two disagree.
"""
from datetime import date as date_cls
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
#: How long a slot lasts when only its start is given.
DEFAULT_SLOT_MINUTES = 30
#: Monday-first, matching `datetime.weekday()` and the availability grid.
DAY_NAMES = ('Monday', 'Tuesday', 'Wednesday', 'Thursday', 'Friday', 'Saturday', 'Sunday')
def slot_end(start_time, minutes=DEFAULT_SLOT_MINUTES, on=None):
"""The end of a slot starting at `start_time`.
Args:
start_time: A `datetime.time`.
minutes: Slot length; defaults to DEFAULT_SLOT_MINUTES.
on: The date the slot falls on. Only matters for a slot that would
cross midnight, where the arbitrary date the old helpers used
(`datetime.today()`) made the result depend on when the code ran.
Returns:
datetime.time: The end of the slot, wrapping past midnight like the
previous implementations did.
"""
anchor = on or date_cls(2000, 1, 1)
return (datetime.combine(anchor, start_time) + timedelta(minutes=minutes)).time()
def day_name(day_of_week):
"""Name of a weekday index, or a readable fallback.
Every caller indexed a module-level list directly, so an out-of-range
day — which nothing prevented before the schemas — was an IndexError
inside a JSON route, i.e. a 500 with an HTML body.
"""
if 0 <= day_of_week < len(DAY_NAMES):
return DAY_NAMES[day_of_week]
return f'Day {day_of_week}'
+70 -22
View File
@@ -461,28 +461,41 @@ class UploadContractSchema(StripMixin):
class OneOnOneRequestSchema(StripMixin):
"""Validate One on One session request form input.
"""A player asking their coach for a session (MNT-12).
Fields:
date: Date string (YYYY-MM-DD), required.
start_time: Time string (HH:MM), required.
end_time: Time string (HH:MM), required.
points: Optional text.
This schema existed before and **was never called**: not imported by any
route, not exercised by any test. `one_on_one.py` parsed the same three
fields by hand, three lines apart, and parsed the date a second time to
get its weekday. That is the pattern the audit named as SEC-AUTHZ-001 —
a validation policy that is written down and not applied — surviving in
a corner nobody had looked at since.
The fields were `String` + `Regexp`, which checked the shape and left the
caller to convert. `Date` and `Time` do both, so the route receives the
objects it is going to store and the "is this a date" question is asked
once, in one place.
"""
date = fields.String(
date = fields.Date(
required=True,
validate=validate.Regexp(
r'^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$', error=_l('Date must be in YYYY-MM-DD format.')
),
error_messages={
'invalid': _l('Date must be in YYYY-MM-DD format.'),
'required': _l('A date is required.'),
},
)
start_time = fields.String(
start_time = fields.Time(
required=True,
validate=validate.Regexp(r'^\d{2}:\d{2}$', error=_l('Start time must be in HH:MM format.')),
error_messages={
'invalid': _l('Start time must be in HH:MM format.'),
'required': _l('A start time is required.'),
},
)
end_time = fields.String(
end_time = fields.Time(
required=True,
validate=validate.Regexp(r'^\d{2}:\d{2}$', error=_l('End time must be in HH:MM format.')),
error_messages={
'invalid': _l('End time must be in HH:MM format.'),
'required': _l('An end time is required.'),
},
)
points = fields.String(
validate=validate.Length(max=2000, error=_l('Points must be 2000 characters or less.')),
@@ -490,22 +503,57 @@ class OneOnOneRequestSchema(StripMixin):
load_default=None,
)
@validates_schema
def validate_window(self, data, **kwargs):
"""A session cannot end before it starts.
class DisponibilityAddSchema(StripMixin):
"""Validate disponibility block addition.
Fields:
day_of_week: Integer 0-6, required.
start_time: Time string (HH:MM), required.
Nothing checked this. The form's own `<select>`s made it awkward to
do by accident, which is not the same as impossible — and the request
went to the coach's Discord either way.
"""
start, end = data.get('start_time'), data.get('end_time')
if start and end and end <= start:
raise ValidationError(_l('End time must be after start time.'), field_name='end_time')
class TimeSlotSchema(Schema):
"""One half-hour slot on a weekday: an availability or a coach booking.
Replaces `DisponibilityAddSchema`, which was also defined and never
called. Used for both the form-encoded single add and the JSON bulk
posts, which is why it is a plain Schema — `StripMixin` reads a blank
string as an absent field, and these payloads arrive as JSON where a
missing key is already absent.
`day_of_week` was checked inline as `day is None or day < 0 or day > 6`,
which raises TypeError rather than rejecting when the JSON holds a
string. Here it is an Integer field with a Range.
"""
class Meta:
"""Marshmallow Meta options.
EXCLUDE, like StripMixin, because the single-slot endpoint is posted
as a form and therefore carries `csrf_token`. Without this the schema
rejected every valid submission — found by the test, not by reading.
"""
unknown = EXCLUDE
day_of_week = fields.Integer(
required=True,
validate=validate.Range(min=0, max=6, error=_l('Day must be 0 (Monday) to 6 (Sunday).')),
error_messages={
'invalid': _l('Day must be 0 (Monday) to 6 (Sunday).'),
'required': _l('A day is required.'),
},
)
start_time = fields.String(
start_time = fields.Time(
required=True,
validate=validate.Regexp(r'^\d{2}:\d{2}$', error=_l('Start time must be in HH:MM format.')),
error_messages={
'invalid': _l('Start time must be in HH:MM format.'),
'required': _l('A start time is required.'),
},
)
+288
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,288 @@
"""The date/time boundary, and what a bad slot does now.
MNT-12. The same parsing block lived in four modules with three different
answers to the same bad input: flash and redirect, set the value to None and
report success, or `continue` in silence. Waves E and G closed the match side
with schemas; this covers what was left — availability, coach bookings and
one-on-one requests.
Two of the findings here were not in the constat.
`OneOnOneRequestSchema` and `DisponibilityAddSchema` were defined in
validators.py and **called from nowhere**: no route imported them, no test
exercised them. That is the SEC-AUTHZ-001 pattern — a validation policy
written down and not applied — surviving in a corner nobody had revisited.
And `manage_coach_availability` deleted every existing slot before re-adding
the ones it could parse, skipping the rest silently and answering
`{'success': true}`. A payload the browser mangled therefore wiped a coach's
bookable hours and reported success. One-on-one requests are refused against
exactly that table, so the coach became unbookable with nothing to show.
"""
from datetime import date, time
import pytest
from app.extensions import db
from app.timeslots import DEFAULT_SLOT_MINUTES, day_name, slot_end
class TestTheSlotRule:
def test_a_slot_lasts_the_default(self):
assert slot_end(time(9, 0)) == time(9, 30)
def test_the_default_is_the_one_the_ui_draws(self):
assert DEFAULT_SLOT_MINUTES == 30
def test_it_does_not_depend_on_the_day_it_is_computed(self):
"""The old helpers anchored on `datetime.today()`, so the result of a
pure arithmetic function depended on when it ran."""
assert slot_end(time(23, 45)) == slot_end(time(23, 45), on=date(2031, 2, 28))
def test_a_slot_may_wrap_past_midnight(self):
"""Preserved from the previous implementations rather than changed:
a coach may plausibly be free at 23:45, and refusing it here would be
a new rule smuggled in with a refactor."""
assert slot_end(time(23, 45)) == time(0, 15)
def test_an_out_of_range_day_is_named_not_raised(self):
"""Indexing the list directly made an unexpected day an IndexError
inside a JSON route — a 500 with an HTML body."""
assert day_name(0) == 'Monday'
assert day_name(6) == 'Sunday'
assert 'Day' in day_name(9)
class TestPlayerAvailability:
def test_a_valid_slot_is_stored_with_its_computed_end(self, app, client, as_role):
from app.models import PlayerDisponibility
player_id = as_role('player')
response = client.post(
'/users/disponibilities/add', data={'day_of_week': '2', 'start_time': '14:00'}
)
assert response.status_code == 200
with app.app_context():
slot = PlayerDisponibility.query.filter_by(player_id=player_id).one()
assert slot.start_time == time(14, 0)
assert slot.end_time == time(14, 30)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
'payload',
[
{'day_of_week': '9', 'start_time': '14:00'},
{'day_of_week': 'monday', 'start_time': '14:00'},
{'day_of_week': '2', 'start_time': 'lunchtime'},
{'day_of_week': '2'},
],
)
def test_a_bad_slot_is_refused_in_json(self, app, client, as_role, payload):
from app.models import PlayerDisponibility
as_role('player')
response = client.post('/users/disponibilities/add', data=payload)
assert response.status_code == 400
assert response.is_json, 'this is a fetch() endpoint (STD-09)'
with app.app_context():
assert PlayerDisponibility.query.count() == 0
class TestBulkAvailabilityReportsWhatItDropped:
def test_valid_slots_are_saved(self, app, client, as_role):
from app.models import PlayerDisponibility
as_role('player')
response = client.post(
'/users/disponibilities/add_bulk',
json={'slots': [{'day_of_week': 1, 'start_time': '09:00'}]},
)
assert response.get_json()['rejected'] == []
with app.app_context():
assert PlayerDisponibility.query.count() == 1
def test_a_dropped_slot_is_named(self, app, client, as_role):
"""It used to `continue` and answer success, so the client could not
tell nine saved from ten sent."""
from app.models import PlayerDisponibility
as_role('player')
response = client.post(
'/users/disponibilities/add_bulk',
json={
'slots': [
{'day_of_week': 1, 'start_time': '09:00'},
{'day_of_week': 1, 'start_time': 'nope'},
]
},
)
body = response.get_json()
assert len(body['created']) == 1
assert len(body['rejected']) == 1, 'the caller must learn a slot was dropped'
with app.app_context():
assert PlayerDisponibility.query.count() == 1
class TestCoachAvailabilityIsNotWipedByABadPayload:
"""The destructive case. This route replaces the whole table for a coach."""
@pytest.fixture
def coach_with_slots(self, app, client, as_role):
from app.models import CoachAvailability
coach_id = as_role('coach')
response = client.post(
'/users/coach-availability',
json={'slots': [{'day_of_week': 1, 'start_time': '09:00'}]},
)
assert response.status_code == 200
with app.app_context():
assert CoachAvailability.query.filter_by(coach_id=coach_id).count() == 1
return coach_id
def test_a_good_payload_replaces_the_slots(self, app, client, coach_with_slots):
from app.models import CoachAvailability
client.post(
'/users/coach-availability',
json={'slots': [{'day_of_week': 3, 'start_time': '18:00'}]},
)
with app.app_context():
slots = CoachAvailability.query.filter_by(coach_id=coach_with_slots).all()
assert [(s.day_of_week, s.start_time) for s in slots] == [(3, time(18, 0))]
def test_a_malformed_slot_changes_nothing(self, app, client, coach_with_slots):
"""Before: the delete had already run, the bad slot was skipped, and
the answer was `{'success': true}` over an emptied table."""
from app.models import CoachAvailability
response = client.post(
'/users/coach-availability',
json={'slots': [{'day_of_week': 3, 'start_time': 'quarter past'}]},
)
assert response.status_code == 400
with app.app_context():
slots = CoachAvailability.query.filter_by(coach_id=coach_with_slots).all()
assert [(s.day_of_week, s.start_time) for s in slots] == [(1, time(9, 0))], (
'the coach lost their bookable hours to a payload that was refused'
)
def test_one_bad_slot_among_good_ones_still_changes_nothing(
self, app, client, coach_with_slots
):
from app.models import CoachAvailability
response = client.post(
'/users/coach-availability',
json={
'slots': [
{'day_of_week': 3, 'start_time': '18:00'},
{'day_of_week': 99, 'start_time': '19:00'},
]
},
)
assert response.status_code == 400
with app.app_context():
slots = CoachAvailability.query.filter_by(coach_id=coach_with_slots).all()
assert [(s.day_of_week, s.start_time) for s in slots] == [(1, time(9, 0))]
class TestOneOnOneRequestGoesThroughItsSchema:
@pytest.fixture
def bookable(self, app, make_user):
"""A player on a team whose coach is free Monday 09:0010:00."""
from app.models import CoachAvailability, OrgTeam, TeamPlayer
admin_id = make_user('admin')
coach_id = make_user('coach')
player_id = make_user('player')
with app.app_context():
team = OrgTeam(name='Varsity', created_by=admin_id, coach_id=coach_id)
db.session.add(team)
db.session.flush()
db.session.add(TeamPlayer(player_id=player_id, org_team_id=team.id))
db.session.add(
CoachAvailability(
coach_id=coach_id,
day_of_week=0,
start_time=time(9, 0),
end_time=time(10, 0),
)
)
db.session.commit()
return player_id
def _login(self, app, client, login, user_id):
from app.models import User
with app.app_context():
username = db.session.get(User, user_id).username
assert login(username).status_code in (301, 302)
def test_a_request_inside_the_window_is_recorded(self, app, client, login, bookable):
from app.models import OneOnOneRequest
self._login(app, client, login, bookable)
client.post(
'/users/one-on-one',
data={
'date': '2030-01-07', # a Monday
'start_time': '09:00',
'end_time': '09:30',
'points': 'aim',
},
)
with app.app_context():
booked = OneOnOneRequest.query.one()
assert booked.date == date(2030, 1, 7)
assert booked.start_time == time(9, 0)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
'form',
[
{'date': 'tomorrow', 'start_time': '09:00', 'end_time': '09:30'},
{'date': '2030-01-07', 'start_time': '9am', 'end_time': '09:30'},
{'date': '2030-01-07', 'start_time': '09:00'},
# End before start: nothing checked this, and the request still
# reached the coach's Discord.
{'date': '2030-01-07', 'start_time': '09:30', 'end_time': '09:00'},
],
)
def test_a_malformed_request_is_refused(self, app, client, login, bookable, form):
from app.models import OneOnOneRequest
self._login(app, client, login, bookable)
response = client.post('/users/one-on-one', data=form, follow_redirects=False)
assert response.status_code < 500
with app.app_context():
assert OneOnOneRequest.query.count() == 0
def test_a_request_outside_the_window_is_still_refused(self, app, client, login, bookable):
"""The availability check survived the rewrite: it now compares times
rather than the original strings."""
from app.models import OneOnOneRequest
self._login(app, client, login, bookable)
client.post(
'/users/one-on-one',
data={'date': '2030-01-07', 'start_time': '14:00', 'end_time': '14:30'},
)
with app.app_context():
assert OneOnOneRequest.query.count() == 0