Files
team-tryouts/tests/test_timeslots.py
T
GGThedandClaude Opus 5 9166d8abeb fix(data): une saisie d heure refusee n efface plus la disponibilite
MNT-12. Le meme bloc de parsing date/heure vivait dans quatre modules avec
trois reponses differentes a la meme saisie invalide : signaler et rediriger,
mettre la valeur a None et annoncer la reussite, ou passer au suivant en
silence. Les vagues E et G ont ferme le cote matchs avec des schemas ; il
restait la disponibilite, les creneaux de coach et les demandes individuelles.

Deux choses trouvees en appliquant, aucune dans le constat.

OneOnOneRequestSchema et DisponibilityAddSchema etaient definis dans
validators.py et appeles NULLE PART : aucun import, aucun test. C'est le
motif SEC-AUTHZ-001 -- une politique de validation ecrite et non appliquee --
qui survivait dans un coin que personne n'avait rouvert. Les deux passaient
d'ailleurs par des fields.String + Regexp, qui verifient la forme et laissent
l'appelant convertir ; fields.Date et fields.Time font les deux.

Et manage_coach_availability supprimait tous les creneaux existants avant de
reajouter ceux qu'il savait lire, ignorant les autres en silence et repondant
{'success': true}. Un envoi malforme effacait donc les heures reservables
d'un coach en annoncant la reussite -- et les demandes individuelles sont
refusees contre exactement cette table, donc le coach devenait injoignable
sans que rien ne le dise. Une operation de remplacement doit tout valider
avant de rien supprimer : le lot est refuse en entier.

Trouve aussi : le controle de disponibilite comparait les chaines du
formulaire aux chaines serialisees, ce qui ne marchait que parce que les deux
cotes etaient en HH:MM a zero non significatif. La comparaison porte
desormais sur des objets time.

Et le lint a rattrape une regression que la relecture avait manquee --
sixieme fois : datetime retire de one_on_one.py alors que deux fonctions non
touchees l'utilisaient encore.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
2026-08-11 20:20:25 -04:00

289 lines
11 KiB
Python
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
"""The date/time boundary, and what a bad slot does now.
MNT-12. The same parsing block lived in four modules with three different
answers to the same bad input: flash and redirect, set the value to None and
report success, or `continue` in silence. Waves E and G closed the match side
with schemas; this covers what was left — availability, coach bookings and
one-on-one requests.
Two of the findings here were not in the constat.
`OneOnOneRequestSchema` and `DisponibilityAddSchema` were defined in
validators.py and **called from nowhere**: no route imported them, no test
exercised them. That is the SEC-AUTHZ-001 pattern — a validation policy
written down and not applied — surviving in a corner nobody had revisited.
And `manage_coach_availability` deleted every existing slot before re-adding
the ones it could parse, skipping the rest silently and answering
`{'success': true}`. A payload the browser mangled therefore wiped a coach's
bookable hours and reported success. One-on-one requests are refused against
exactly that table, so the coach became unbookable with nothing to show.
"""
from datetime import date, time
import pytest
from app.extensions import db
from app.timeslots import DEFAULT_SLOT_MINUTES, day_name, slot_end
class TestTheSlotRule:
def test_a_slot_lasts_the_default(self):
assert slot_end(time(9, 0)) == time(9, 30)
def test_the_default_is_the_one_the_ui_draws(self):
assert DEFAULT_SLOT_MINUTES == 30
def test_it_does_not_depend_on_the_day_it_is_computed(self):
"""The old helpers anchored on `datetime.today()`, so the result of a
pure arithmetic function depended on when it ran."""
assert slot_end(time(23, 45)) == slot_end(time(23, 45), on=date(2031, 2, 28))
def test_a_slot_may_wrap_past_midnight(self):
"""Preserved from the previous implementations rather than changed:
a coach may plausibly be free at 23:45, and refusing it here would be
a new rule smuggled in with a refactor."""
assert slot_end(time(23, 45)) == time(0, 15)
def test_an_out_of_range_day_is_named_not_raised(self):
"""Indexing the list directly made an unexpected day an IndexError
inside a JSON route — a 500 with an HTML body."""
assert day_name(0) == 'Monday'
assert day_name(6) == 'Sunday'
assert 'Day' in day_name(9)
class TestPlayerAvailability:
def test_a_valid_slot_is_stored_with_its_computed_end(self, app, client, as_role):
from app.models import PlayerDisponibility
player_id = as_role('player')
response = client.post(
'/users/disponibilities/add', data={'day_of_week': '2', 'start_time': '14:00'}
)
assert response.status_code == 200
with app.app_context():
slot = PlayerDisponibility.query.filter_by(player_id=player_id).one()
assert slot.start_time == time(14, 0)
assert slot.end_time == time(14, 30)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
'payload',
[
{'day_of_week': '9', 'start_time': '14:00'},
{'day_of_week': 'monday', 'start_time': '14:00'},
{'day_of_week': '2', 'start_time': 'lunchtime'},
{'day_of_week': '2'},
],
)
def test_a_bad_slot_is_refused_in_json(self, app, client, as_role, payload):
from app.models import PlayerDisponibility
as_role('player')
response = client.post('/users/disponibilities/add', data=payload)
assert response.status_code == 400
assert response.is_json, 'this is a fetch() endpoint (STD-09)'
with app.app_context():
assert PlayerDisponibility.query.count() == 0
class TestBulkAvailabilityReportsWhatItDropped:
def test_valid_slots_are_saved(self, app, client, as_role):
from app.models import PlayerDisponibility
as_role('player')
response = client.post(
'/users/disponibilities/add_bulk',
json={'slots': [{'day_of_week': 1, 'start_time': '09:00'}]},
)
assert response.get_json()['rejected'] == []
with app.app_context():
assert PlayerDisponibility.query.count() == 1
def test_a_dropped_slot_is_named(self, app, client, as_role):
"""It used to `continue` and answer success, so the client could not
tell nine saved from ten sent."""
from app.models import PlayerDisponibility
as_role('player')
response = client.post(
'/users/disponibilities/add_bulk',
json={
'slots': [
{'day_of_week': 1, 'start_time': '09:00'},
{'day_of_week': 1, 'start_time': 'nope'},
]
},
)
body = response.get_json()
assert len(body['created']) == 1
assert len(body['rejected']) == 1, 'the caller must learn a slot was dropped'
with app.app_context():
assert PlayerDisponibility.query.count() == 1
class TestCoachAvailabilityIsNotWipedByABadPayload:
"""The destructive case. This route replaces the whole table for a coach."""
@pytest.fixture
def coach_with_slots(self, app, client, as_role):
from app.models import CoachAvailability
coach_id = as_role('coach')
response = client.post(
'/users/coach-availability',
json={'slots': [{'day_of_week': 1, 'start_time': '09:00'}]},
)
assert response.status_code == 200
with app.app_context():
assert CoachAvailability.query.filter_by(coach_id=coach_id).count() == 1
return coach_id
def test_a_good_payload_replaces_the_slots(self, app, client, coach_with_slots):
from app.models import CoachAvailability
client.post(
'/users/coach-availability',
json={'slots': [{'day_of_week': 3, 'start_time': '18:00'}]},
)
with app.app_context():
slots = CoachAvailability.query.filter_by(coach_id=coach_with_slots).all()
assert [(s.day_of_week, s.start_time) for s in slots] == [(3, time(18, 0))]
def test_a_malformed_slot_changes_nothing(self, app, client, coach_with_slots):
"""Before: the delete had already run, the bad slot was skipped, and
the answer was `{'success': true}` over an emptied table."""
from app.models import CoachAvailability
response = client.post(
'/users/coach-availability',
json={'slots': [{'day_of_week': 3, 'start_time': 'quarter past'}]},
)
assert response.status_code == 400
with app.app_context():
slots = CoachAvailability.query.filter_by(coach_id=coach_with_slots).all()
assert [(s.day_of_week, s.start_time) for s in slots] == [(1, time(9, 0))], (
'the coach lost their bookable hours to a payload that was refused'
)
def test_one_bad_slot_among_good_ones_still_changes_nothing(
self, app, client, coach_with_slots
):
from app.models import CoachAvailability
response = client.post(
'/users/coach-availability',
json={
'slots': [
{'day_of_week': 3, 'start_time': '18:00'},
{'day_of_week': 99, 'start_time': '19:00'},
]
},
)
assert response.status_code == 400
with app.app_context():
slots = CoachAvailability.query.filter_by(coach_id=coach_with_slots).all()
assert [(s.day_of_week, s.start_time) for s in slots] == [(1, time(9, 0))]
class TestOneOnOneRequestGoesThroughItsSchema:
@pytest.fixture
def bookable(self, app, make_user):
"""A player on a team whose coach is free Monday 09:0010:00."""
from app.models import CoachAvailability, OrgTeam, TeamPlayer
admin_id = make_user('admin')
coach_id = make_user('coach')
player_id = make_user('player')
with app.app_context():
team = OrgTeam(name='Varsity', created_by=admin_id, coach_id=coach_id)
db.session.add(team)
db.session.flush()
db.session.add(TeamPlayer(player_id=player_id, org_team_id=team.id))
db.session.add(
CoachAvailability(
coach_id=coach_id,
day_of_week=0,
start_time=time(9, 0),
end_time=time(10, 0),
)
)
db.session.commit()
return player_id
def _login(self, app, client, login, user_id):
from app.models import User
with app.app_context():
username = db.session.get(User, user_id).username
assert login(username).status_code in (301, 302)
def test_a_request_inside_the_window_is_recorded(self, app, client, login, bookable):
from app.models import OneOnOneRequest
self._login(app, client, login, bookable)
client.post(
'/users/one-on-one',
data={
'date': '2030-01-07', # a Monday
'start_time': '09:00',
'end_time': '09:30',
'points': 'aim',
},
)
with app.app_context():
booked = OneOnOneRequest.query.one()
assert booked.date == date(2030, 1, 7)
assert booked.start_time == time(9, 0)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
'form',
[
{'date': 'tomorrow', 'start_time': '09:00', 'end_time': '09:30'},
{'date': '2030-01-07', 'start_time': '9am', 'end_time': '09:30'},
{'date': '2030-01-07', 'start_time': '09:00'},
# End before start: nothing checked this, and the request still
# reached the coach's Discord.
{'date': '2030-01-07', 'start_time': '09:30', 'end_time': '09:00'},
],
)
def test_a_malformed_request_is_refused(self, app, client, login, bookable, form):
from app.models import OneOnOneRequest
self._login(app, client, login, bookable)
response = client.post('/users/one-on-one', data=form, follow_redirects=False)
assert response.status_code < 500
with app.app_context():
assert OneOnOneRequest.query.count() == 0
def test_a_request_outside_the_window_is_still_refused(self, app, client, login, bookable):
"""The availability check survived the rewrite: it now compares times
rather than the original strings."""
from app.models import OneOnOneRequest
self._login(app, client, login, bookable)
client.post(
'/users/one-on-one',
data={'date': '2030-01-07', 'start_time': '14:00', 'end_time': '14:30'},
)
with app.app_context():
assert OneOnOneRequest.query.count() == 0